
Celeron G4930

Core i7-7Y75
Celeron G4930 vs Core i7-7Y75 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4930 vs Core i7-7Y75 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G4930 vs Core i7-7Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4930
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 842.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.7 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i7-7Y75 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 54W vs 4.5W.
Core i7-7Y75
2016Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 5W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,534 vs 2,551).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 60.7 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4930 better than Core i7-7Y75?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4930 vs Core i7-7Y75 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930
The Celeron G4930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,551 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i7-7Y75
The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.
Processing Power
The Celeron G4930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-7Y75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4930 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7Y75 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron G4930 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4930 scores 2,551 against the Core i7-7Y75's 2,534 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G4930. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G4930 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75.
| Feature | Celeron G4930 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+146% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,551 | 2,534 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 672 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,229 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G4930 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4930) / not specified (Core i7-7Y75). The Celeron G4930 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i7-7Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930 rivals Pentium G5420.
| Feature | Celeron G4930 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G4930 was priced at $42, while the Core i7-7Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($42 vs $393), Celeron G4930 was $351 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4930 delivers 60.7 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-7Y75 — making the Celeron G4930 the 161.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G4930 | Core i7-7Y75 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-89% | $393 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.7+848% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














