Celeron G540 vs Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Celeron G540
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G540 is positioned at rank 622 and the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is on rank 1082, so the Celeron G540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G540
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G540 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G540 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G540 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Celeron G540
The Celeron G540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,182 points. Launch price was $158.
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G540 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron G540 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G540. The Celeron G540 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G540 scores 1,182 against the Athlon 64 X2 4000+'s 1,175 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G540. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 384 vs 195, a 65.3% lead for the Celeron G540 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 655 vs 380 (53.1% advantage for the Celeron G540). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G540 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+.
| Feature | Celeron G540 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,182 | 1,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 384+97% | 195 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 655+72% | 380 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G540 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G540 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ — the Celeron G540 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G540 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G540) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) — the Celeron G540 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G540) and nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 X2 4000+).
| Feature | Celeron G540 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G540) vs AMD-V (Athlon 64 X2 4000+). The Celeron G540 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G540 targets Desktop, Athlon 64 X2 4000+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G540 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G540 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G540 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ debuted at $328. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G540 delivers 118.2 pts/$ vs 117.5 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ — making the Celeron G540 the 0.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G540 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-87% | $328 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 118.2 | 117.5 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G540 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+
