Celeron G550
VS
A6-3410MX

Celeron G550 vs A6-3410MX

Intel

Celeron G550

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A6-3410MX

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G550 is positioned at rank 698 and the A6-3410MX is on rank 850, so the Celeron G550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12713%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12012%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8722%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2628%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2081%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1821%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1043%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1029%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
937%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
937%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
927%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
902%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
889%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
885%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
877%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
97%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3410MX

#838
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1382%
#839
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1362%
#840
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1250%
#841
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1244%
#842
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1233%
#844
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1191%
#845
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1142%
#846
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1140%
#847
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1109%
#850
A6-3410MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
99%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G550 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A6-3410MX in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G550A6-3410MX
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G550A6-3410MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G550 and A6-3410MX

Intel

Celeron G550

The Celeron G550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

AMD

A6-3410MX

The A6-3410MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Celeron G550 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-3410MX offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3410MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G550 versus 2.3 GHz on the A6-3410MX — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G550 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G550 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-3410MX uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G550 scores 1,275 against the A6-3410MX's 1,274 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G550. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 379 vs 271, a 33.2% lead for the Celeron G550 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G550 vs 0 kB on the A6-3410MX.

FeatureCeleron G550A6-3410MX
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+13%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+63%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,275
1,274
Geekbench 6 Single
379+40%
271
Geekbench 6 Multi
663
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G550 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-3410MX uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G550 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCeleron G550A6-3410MX
Socket
LGA1155
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G550) vs AMD-V (A6-3410MX). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550) and Radeon HD 6520G (A6-3410MX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G550 targets Budget, A6-3410MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G550 rivals Pentium G630; A6-3410MX rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureCeleron G550A6-3410MX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Radeon HD 6520G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Mainstream Laptop