Celeron G550
VS
A6-5400K

Celeron G550 vs A6-5400K

Intel

Celeron G550

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A6-5400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G550 is positioned at rank 698 and the A6-5400K is on rank 765, so the Celeron G550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12713%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12012%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8722%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2628%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2081%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1821%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1043%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1029%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
937%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
937%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
927%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
902%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
889%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
885%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
877%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
97%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-5400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14621%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13815%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10031%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3022%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2394%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2094%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1199%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1184%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1078%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1078%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1066%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1037%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1022%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1018%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1009%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
98%
#764
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
100%
#765
A6-5400K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#766
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
99%
#768
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
99%
#769
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
99%
#770
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
99%
#771
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
99%
#772
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
99%
#774
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
98%
#775
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
98%
#776
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
98%
#777
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
98%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
98%
#779
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-5400K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G550 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G550A6-5400K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G550A6-5400K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G550 and A6-5400K

Intel

Celeron G550

The Celeron G550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

AMD

A6-5400K

The A6-5400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,279 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G550 and A6-5400K share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G550 versus 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400K — a 37.5% clock advantage for the A6-5400K (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G550 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-5400K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G550 scores 1,275 against the A6-5400K's 1,279 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-5400K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 379 vs 390, a 2.9% lead for the A6-5400K that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G550 vs 0 kB on the A6-5400K.

FeatureCeleron G550A6-5400K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+46%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,275
1,279
Geekbench 6 Single
379
390+3%
Geekbench 6 Multi
663
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G550 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-5400K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G550) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (A6-5400K).

FeatureCeleron G550A6-5400K
Socket
LGA1155
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-5400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G550) vs AMD-V (A6-5400K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550) and Radeon HD 7540D (A6-5400K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G550 targets Budget, A6-5400K targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G550 rivals Pentium G630; A6-5400K rivals Pentium G2120.

FeatureCeleron G550A6-5400K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Radeon HD 7540D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget Desktop