
Celeron G555 vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Celeron G555

Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G555 is positioned at rank 634 and the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is on rank 988, so the Celeron G555 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G555
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G555 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G555 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+180%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G555 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Celeron G555
The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+
The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,425 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G555 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G555. The Celeron G555 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G555 scores 1,427 against the Athlon 64 X2 5000+'s 1,425 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G555. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G555 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+4% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,427 | 1,425 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 398 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 742 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G555 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G555 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — the Celeron G555 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G555 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G555) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+) — the Celeron G555 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G555) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5000+).
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G555) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5000+). The Celeron G555 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G555 launched at $52 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ debuted at $136. At current prices ($15 vs $42), the Celeron G555 is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G555 delivers 95.1 pts/$ vs 33.9 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ — making the Celeron G555 the 94.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-62% | $136 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-64% | $42 |
| Performance per Dollar | 95.1+181% | 33.9 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















