Celeron G555 vs Celeron N2805

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G555 vs Celeron N2805 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G555 vs Celeron N2805: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G555

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Celeron N2805.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,427 vs 1,430).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Celeron N2805 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Celeron N2805

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G555.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2805 better than Celeron G555?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G555 is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2805 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2805 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2805 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2805 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Celeron G555 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (27.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2805 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G555 vs Celeron N2805 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G555

The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

Celeron N2805

The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G555 and Celeron N2805 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 versus 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 — a 59.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G555 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.46 GHz). The Celeron G555 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N2805 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G555 scores 1,427 against the Celeron N2805's 1,430 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N2805. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G555 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2805.

Feature	Celeron G555	Celeron N2805
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+85%	1.46 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+85%	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,427	1,430
Geekbench 6 Single	398	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	742	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G555 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2805 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G555 versus 1066 on the Celeron N2805 — the Celeron G555 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G555 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron G555) vs 1 (Celeron N2805). PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G555) vs 4 (Celeron N2805) — the Celeron G555 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G555) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2805).

Feature	Celeron G555	Celeron N2805
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G555) vs true (Celeron N2805). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G555) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2805) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100.

Feature	Celeron G555	Celeron N2805
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Desktop	—