
Celeron G555

Pentium G2020T
Celeron G555 vs Pentium G2020T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G555 vs Pentium G2020T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G555 vs Pentium G2020T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G555
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium G2020T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Pentium G2020T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,427 vs 1,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Pentium G2020T
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G555 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G555.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G2020T better than Celeron G555?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G555 vs Pentium G2020T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G555
The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

Pentium G2020T
The Pentium G2020T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $64.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G555 and Pentium G2020T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium G2020T — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G555 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G555 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G2020T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G555 scores 1,427 against the Pentium G2020T's 1,430 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium G2020T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G555 vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2020T.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium G2020T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3072 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,427 | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 398 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 742 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium G2020T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G555) / not specified (Pentium G2020T). The Celeron G555 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G2020T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium G2020T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G555 was priced at $52, while the Pentium G2020T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($52 vs $64), Celeron G555 was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G555 delivers 27.4 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G2020T — making the Celeron G555 the 20.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium G2020T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-19% | $64 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.4+23% | 22.3 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














