Celeron G5900T vs Core 2 Duo P7370

Intel

Celeron G5900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P7370

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G5900T vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900T vs Core 2 Duo P7370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900T vs Core 2 Duo P7370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900T

2020

Why buy it

  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core 2 Duo P7370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P7370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1066.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P7370

2009

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,191 vs 2,192).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900T better than Core 2 Duo P7370?
Yes. Celeron G5900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G5900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5900T vs Core 2 Duo P7370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G5900T

The Celeron G5900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,192 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7370

The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G5900T and Core 2 Duo P7370 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Core 2 Duo P7370 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5900T scores 2,192 against the Core 2 Duo P7370's 2,191 — a 0% lead for the Celeron G5900T. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5900T vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370.

FeatureCeleron G5900TCore 2 Duo P7370
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB Intel® Smart Cache
3 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache
3 MB
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,192
2,191
Geekbench 6 Single
748
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900T versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — the Celeron G5900T supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900T) and Mobile (Core 2 Duo P7370).

FeatureCeleron G5900TCore 2 Duo P7370
Socket
LGA1200
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+150%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+1500%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900T) vs false (Core 2 Duo P7370). The Celeron G5900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900T rivals Pentium Gold G6400T.

FeatureCeleron G5900TCore 2 Duo P7370
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
false
Target Use
Budget