PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900T vs Core m3-6Y30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900T vs Core m3-6Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900T

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 572.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.2 vs 7.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core m3-6Y30 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).

Core m3-6Y30

2015

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,180 vs 2,192).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5900T better than Core m3-6Y30?

Yes. Celeron G5900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G5900T comes in $239 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 572.7% better value on MSRP (52.2 vs 7.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5900T vs Core m3-6Y30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900T

The Celeron G5900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,192 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-6Y30's 2 cores. The Core m3-6Y30 is built on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5900T scores 2,192 against the Core m3-6Y30's 2,180 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G5900T. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5900T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30.

Feature	Celeron G5900T	Core m3-6Y30
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+256%	0.9 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB Intel® Smart Cache	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,192	2,180
Geekbench 6 Single	748	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	750	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5900T	Core m3-6Y30
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5900T) / not specified (Core m3-6Y30). The Celeron G5900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m3-6Y30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900T rivals Pentium Gold G6400T.

Feature	Celeron G5900T	Core m3-6Y30
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5900T was priced at $42, while the Core m3-6Y30 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($42 vs $281), Celeron G5900T was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900T delivers 52.2 pts/$ vs 7.8 pts/$ for the Core m3-6Y30 — making the Celeron G5900T the 148.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5900T	Core m3-6Y30
MSRP	$42-85%	$281
Performance per Dollar	52.2+569%	7.8
Release Date	2020	2015

Search Celeron G5900T on Amazon

Search Core m3-6Y30 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.