Celeron G5900T vs Pro A8-8600B

Intel

Celeron G5900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Pro A8-8600B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G5900T vs Pro A8-8600B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900T vs Pro A8-8600B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900T vs Pro A8-8600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900T

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $108 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 255.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.2 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pro A8-8600B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,192 vs 2,203).
  • 1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Pro A8-8600B

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A8-8600B better than Celeron G5900T?
Yes. Pro A8-8600B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pro A8-8600B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A8-8600B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pro A8-8600B is still the better call for a fresh build. Pro A8-8600B comes in 257.1% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5900T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,192 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5900T vs Pro A8-8600B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G5900T

The Celeron G5900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,192 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Pro A8-8600B

The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pro A8-8600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 2 more cores. The Pro A8-8600B is built on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5900T scores 2,192 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 0.5% lead for the Pro A8-8600B.

FeatureCeleron G5900TPro A8-8600B
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+100%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
2048 kB
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,192
2,203
Geekbench 6 Single
748
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G5900TPro A8-8600B
Socket
LGA1200
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5900T) / not specified (Pro A8-8600B). The Celeron G5900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pro A8-8600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900T rivals Pentium Gold G6400T.

FeatureCeleron G5900TPro A8-8600B
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5900T was priced at $42, while the Pro A8-8600B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($42 vs $150), Celeron G5900T was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900T delivers 52.2 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Celeron G5900T the 112.2% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G5900TPro A8-8600B
MSRP
$42-72%
$150
Performance per Dollar
52.2+255%
14.7
Release Date
2020
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.