Celeron G5905T
VS
A8-3870K

Celeron G5905T vs A8-3870K

Intel

Celeron G5905T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2020
VS
AMD

A8-3870K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5905T

#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
116%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
114%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
112%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
112%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
111%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
110%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
110%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
110%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
109%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
109%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
107%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
106%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
104%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
104%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
104%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
100%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
100%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
99%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
98%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
98%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
96%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
96%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
95%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
95%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
95%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
95%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
94%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7926%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7489%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5438%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1298%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1135%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
650%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
584%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
578%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
562%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
554%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
552%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
547%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
99%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
99%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
98%
#502
A8-3870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
99%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G5905T (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G5905TA8-3870K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-3870K (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G5905TA8-3870K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G5905T and A8-3870K

Intel

Celeron G5905T

The Celeron G5905T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A8-3870K

The A8-3870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,360 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5905T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-3870K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3870K has 2 more cores. The A8-3870K is built on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905T scores 2,356 against the A8-3870K's 2,360 — a 0.2% lead for the A8-3870K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 748 vs 380, a 65.2% lead for the Celeron G5905T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905T vs 0 kB on the A8-3870K.

FeatureCeleron G5905TA8-3870K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+10%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,356
2,360
Geekbench 6 Single
748+97%
380
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5905T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-3870K uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905T versus DDR3-1866 on the A8-3870K — the Celeron G5905T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5905T) vs 20 (A8-3870K) — the A8-3870K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905T) and A55,A75 (A8-3870K).

FeatureCeleron G5905TA8-3870K
Socket
LGA1200
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A8-3870K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5905T) vs AMD-V (A8-3870K). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5905T) and Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3870K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905T targets Budget, A8-3870K targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905T rivals Pentium Gold G6405T; A8-3870K rivals Core i3-2125.

FeatureCeleron G5905TA8-3870K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget Gaming Desktop