
Celeron G5905T

Xeon E5440
Celeron G5905T vs Xeon E5440 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G5905T vs Xeon E5440 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G5905T vs Xeon E5440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G5905T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $640 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1273.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.1 vs 3.4 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon E5440 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,356 vs 2,367).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5440, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
Xeon E5440
2007Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 47.1 PassMark/$ ($690 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5440 better than Celeron G5905T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5905T vs Xeon E5440 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5905T
The Celeron G5905T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5440
The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.
Processing Power
The Celeron G5905T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. The Xeon E5440 is built on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905T scores 2,356 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5440. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905T vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.
| Feature | Celeron G5905T | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | — | 0.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+17% | 2.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | — | 6 MB (total) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | — | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,356 | 2,367 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 748 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 750 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G5905T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G5905T | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5905T) / not specified (Xeon E5440). The Celeron G5905T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905T rivals Pentium Gold G6405T.
| Feature | Celeron G5905T | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G5905T was priced at $50, while the Xeon E5440 came in at $690. On launch pricing ($50 vs $690), Celeron G5905T was $640 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5905T delivers 47.1 pts/$ vs 3.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 — making the Celeron G5905T the 172.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G5905T | Xeon E5440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-93% | $690 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.1+1285% | 3.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














