PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5905T vs Core m5-6Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5905T vs Core m5-6Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5905T

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 465.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.1 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core m5-6Y57 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.

Core m5-6Y57

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,342 vs 2,356).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 47.1 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5905T better than Core m5-6Y57?

Yes. Celeron G5905T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5905T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5905T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5905T is the better buy right now. Celeron G5905T comes in $231 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 465.4% better value on MSRP (47.1 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5905T vs Core m5-6Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5905T

The Celeron G5905T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5905T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m5-6Y57's 2 cores. The Core m5-6Y57 is built on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905T scores 2,356 against the Core m5-6Y57's 2,342 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G5905T. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57.

Feature	Celeron G5905T	Core m5-6Y57
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+200%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,356	2,342
Geekbench 6 Single	748	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	750	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5905T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5905T	Core m5-6Y57
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5905T) / not specified (Core m5-6Y57). The Celeron G5905T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905T rivals Pentium Gold G6405T.

Feature	Celeron G5905T	Core m5-6Y57
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5905T was priced at $50, while the Core m5-6Y57 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($50 vs $281), Celeron G5905T was $231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5905T delivers 47.1 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y57 — making the Celeron G5905T the 139.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5905T	Core m5-6Y57
MSRP	$50-82%	$281
Performance per Dollar	47.1+467%	8.3
Release Date	2020	2015

Search Celeron G5905T on Amazon

Search Core m5-6Y57 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.