
Celeron G4900

Celeron G5905T
Celeron G4900 vs Celeron G5905T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4900 vs Celeron G5905T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G4900 vs Celeron G5905T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4900
2018Why buy it
- ✅+13.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.4 vs 47.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
Celeron G5905T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (748 vs 850).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (750 vs 1,550).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.1 vs 56.4 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4900 better than Celeron G5905T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4900 vs Celeron G5905T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900
The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron G5905T
The Celeron G5905T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G4900 and Celeron G5905T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G4900 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Celeron G5905T's 2,356 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G4900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 748, a 12.8% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,550 vs 750 (69.6% advantage for the Celeron G4900). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905T.
| Feature | Celeron G4900 | Celeron G5905T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 2,370 | 2,356 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850+14% | 748 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,550+107% | 750 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5905T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900 versus DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905T — the Celeron G5905T supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905T).
| Feature | Celeron G4900 | Celeron G5905T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666+11% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5905T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget, Celeron G5905T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400; Celeron G5905T rivals Pentium Gold G6405T.
| Feature | Celeron G4900 | Celeron G5905T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G4900 was priced at $42, while the Celeron G5905T came in at $50. On launch pricing ($42 vs $50), Celeron G4900 was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 56.4 pts/$ vs 47.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G5905T — making the Celeron G4900 the 18% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G4900 | Celeron G5905T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-16% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.4+20% | 47.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














