Celeron G4900 vs Core m7-6Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900 vs Core m7-6Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900 vs Core m7-6Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 838.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 2,370).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 56.4 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900 better than Core m7-6Y75?

Yes. Celeron G4900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900 comes in $351 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 838.5% better value on MSRP (56.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4900 vs Core m7-6Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m7-6Y75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G4900. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Core m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+158%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,370	2,363
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,550	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m7-6Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Core m7-6Y75
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900) / not specified (Core m7-6Y75). The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Core m7-6Y75
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4900 was priced at $42, while the Core m7-6Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($42 vs $393), Celeron G4900 was $351 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 56.4 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Celeron G4900 the 161.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Core m7-6Y75
MSRP	$42-89%	$393
Performance per Dollar	56.4+840%	6.0
Release Date	2018	2015

Search Celeron G4900 on Amazon

Search Core m7-6Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.