Celeron G4900 vs Pentium P6200

Intel

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium P6200

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G4900 vs Pentium P6200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900 vs Pentium P6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900 vs Pentium P6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900

2018

Why buy it

  • +325% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Costs $18 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Delivers 41.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.4 vs 39.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

Pentium P6200

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 850).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (400 vs 1,550).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.9 vs 56.4 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900 better than Pentium P6200?
Yes. Celeron G4900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 287.5% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 287.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G4900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900 comes in $18 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 41.4% better value on MSRP (56.4 vs 39.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010), 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4900 vs Pentium P6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G4900 and Pentium P6200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 1% lead for the Pentium P6200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 200, a 123.8% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,550 vs 400 (117.9% advantage for the Celeron G4900). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.

FeatureCeleron G4900Pentium P6200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+2285%
0.13 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+46%
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,370
2,394+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
850+325%
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,550+288%
400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900 versus DDR3-1066 on the Pentium P6200 — the Celeron G4900 supports 125.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900) and HM55,HM57 (Pentium P6200).

FeatureCeleron G4900Pentium P6200
Socket
LGA1151
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+125%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+700%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4900) vs None (Pentium P6200). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900) and Intel HD Graphics (Pentium P6200) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget, Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

FeatureCeleron G4900Pentium P6200
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
None
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4900 was priced at $42, while the Pentium P6200 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($42 vs $60), Celeron G4900 was $18 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 56.4 pts/$ vs 39.9 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Celeron G4900 the 34.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G4900Pentium P6200
MSRP
$42-30%
$60
Performance per Dollar
56.4+41%
39.9
Release Date
2018
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.