Celeron G4900
VS
Xeon E5440

Celeron G4900 vs Xeon E5440

Intel

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Xeon E5440

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.83 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900

#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
149%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
140%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
140%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
138%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
133%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
130%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
128%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
124%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
124%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
119%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
117%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
116%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
109%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
102%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
101%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
94%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
92%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
85%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
80%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
73%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
71%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
50%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
28%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5440

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
60590%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
11440%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
10164%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
7852%
#540
Xeon E7-8891 v3
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $418
92%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
73%
#1008
Xeon E5440
MSRP: $690|Avg: $37
100%
#1009
Xeon E5-2643
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $50
98%
#1010
Xeon E5-2637
MSRP: $885|Avg: $40
98%
#1011
Xeon W3570
MSRP: $999|Avg: $15
95%
#1013
Xeon E5-4620
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $400
90%
#1014
Xeon E5-2680
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $40
84%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
75%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
69%
#1019
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
69%
#1020
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
69%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
65%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
59%
#1023
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
54%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4900 (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G4900Xeon E5440
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($37)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5440 (2007) relies on 45 nm technology and **DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G4900Xeon E5440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+129%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($37)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G4900 and Xeon E5440

Intel

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Xeon E5440

The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 — a 115.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5440 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G4900. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.

FeatureCeleron G4900Xeon E5440
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+273%
0.83 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+10%
2.83 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
6 MB (total)+2300%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark
2,370
2,367
Geekbench 6 Single
850
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G4900Xeon E5440
Socket
LGA1151
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900) / not specified (Xeon E5440). The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

FeatureCeleron G4900Xeon E5440
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G4900 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Xeon E5440 debuted at $690. At current prices ($85 vs $37), the Xeon E5440 is $48 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 64.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 — making the Xeon E5440 the 78.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G4900Xeon E5440
MSRP
$42-94%
$690
Avg Price (30d)
$85
$37-56%
Performance per Dollar
27.9
64.0+129%
Release Date
2018
2007