Celeron G4900 vs Xeon E5440

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900 vs Xeon E5440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900 vs Xeon E5440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $648 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1544.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.4 vs 3.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $690 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 80W, a 26W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon E5440 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5440, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5440

2007

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,367 vs 2,370).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 56.4 PassMark/$ ($690 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌48.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900 better than Xeon E5440?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G4900 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900 comes in $648 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $690 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1544.9% better value on MSRP (56.4 vs 3.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4900 vs Xeon E5440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Xeon E5440

The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5440 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 — a 115.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5440 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Xeon E5440's 2,367 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G4900. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Xeon E5440
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+273%	0.83 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+10%	2.83 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,370	2,367
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,550	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5440 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Xeon E5440
Socket	LGA1151	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900) / not specified (Xeon E5440). The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Xeon E5440
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4900 was priced at $42, while the Xeon E5440 came in at $690. On launch pricing ($42 vs $690), Celeron G4900 was $648 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 56.4 pts/$ vs 3.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5440 — making the Celeron G4900 the 177.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4900	Xeon E5440
MSRP	$42-94%	$690
Performance per Dollar	56.4+1559%	3.4
Release Date	2018	2007

Search Celeron G4900 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.