3020e vs Celeron G4900

CPU

GPU

3020e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2020

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

3020e vs Celeron G4900 Performance Spectrum

3020e

2 / 2

2,406

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G4900

2 / 2

2,370

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3020e vs Celeron G4900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3020e vs Celeron G4900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3020e

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 54W, a 53W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (660 vs 850).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,100 vs 1,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 56.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Celeron G4900

2018

Why buy it

✅+28.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 134.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.4 vs 24.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌5300% higher power demand at 54W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900 better than 3020e?

Yes. Celeron G4900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 40.9% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 40.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900 comes in $58 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 134.5% better value on MSRP (56.4 vs 24.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3020e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

3020e vs Celeron G4900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3020e

The 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,406 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the 3020e and Celeron G4900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the 3020e versus 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 — a 17.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The 3020e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G4900 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the 3020e scores 2,406 against the Celeron G4900's 2,370 — a 1.5% lead for the 3020e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 660 vs 850, a 25.2% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,100 vs 1,550 (34% advantage for the Celeron G4900). L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3020e vs 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900.

Feature	3020e	Celeron G4900
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.1 GHz+158%
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Dali (Zen) (2020)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,406+2%	2,370
Cinebench R23 Multi	480	—
Geekbench 6 Single	660	850+29%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	1,550+41%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3020e uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G4900 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Celeron G4900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (3020e) vs 16 (Celeron G4900) — the Celeron G4900 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	3020e	Celeron G4900
Socket	FT5	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (3020e) vs VT-x (Celeron G4900). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (Vega 3) (3020e) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: 3020e targets Entry Level Laptop, Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: 3020e rivals Celeron N4020; Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

Feature	3020e	Celeron G4900
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics (Vega 3)	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Entry Level Laptop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the 3020e was priced at $100, while the Celeron G4900 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($100 vs $42), Celeron G4900 was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the 3020e delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 56.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G4900 — making the Celeron G4900 the 80.4% better value option.

Feature	3020e	Celeron G4900
MSRP	$100	$42-58%
Performance per Dollar	24.1	56.4+134%
Release Date	2020	2018

Search 3020e on Amazon

Search Celeron G4900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.