Celeron G4900
VS
Core i7-3517UE

Celeron G4900 vs Core i7-3517UE

Intel

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-3517UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900

#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
149%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
140%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
140%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
138%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
133%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
130%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
128%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
124%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
124%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
119%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
117%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
116%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
109%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
102%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
101%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
94%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
92%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
85%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
80%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
73%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
71%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
50%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
28%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3517UE

#1142
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4064%
#1143
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4004%
#1144
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3676%
#1145
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3659%
#1146
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3626%
#1148
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3501%
#1149
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3357%
#1150
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3352%
#1151
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3262%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
100%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
100%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
99%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
95%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4900 (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G4900Core i7-3517UE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($35)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3517UE (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and **unknown Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G4900Core i7-3517UE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+144%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G4900 and Core i7-3517UE

Intel

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i7-3517UE

The Core i7-3517UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,384 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3517UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-3517UE — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3517UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Core i7-3517UE's 2,384 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-3517UE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517UE.

FeatureCeleron G4900Core i7-3517UE
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+11%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+82%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,370
2,384
Geekbench 6 Single
850
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3517UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G4900Core i7-3517UE
Socket
LGA1151
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900) / not specified (Core i7-3517UE). The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i7-3517UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

FeatureCeleron G4900Core i7-3517UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G4900 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Core i7-3517UE debuted at $330. At current prices ($85 vs $35), the Core i7-3517UE is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 68.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-3517UE — making the Core i7-3517UE the 83.8% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G4900Core i7-3517UE
MSRP
$42-87%
$330
Avg Price (30d)
$85
$35-59%
Performance per Dollar
27.9
68.1+144%
Release Date
2018
2012