
Celeron G6900T

Core i5-12400F
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G6900T
2022Why buy it
- β +272.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- β Costs $132 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 710, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 87.3 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +170.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Delivers 28.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 87.3 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 2,450).
- β314.3% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Celeron G6900T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T
The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F β a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 β a 136.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,400 vs 1,700, a 19.4% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,450 vs 657 (115.4% advantage for the Celeron G6900T). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+57% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+12% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+350% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 3,668 | 19,532+432% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400 | 1,700+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,450+273% | 657 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($42 vs $174), Celeron G6900T was $132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F β making the Core i5-12400F the 25% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-76% | $174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3 | 112.3+29% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














