PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 710, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,450 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 87.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +173.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Delivers 46.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 87.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
366.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G6900T?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 173.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 365.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 582.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 173.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 365.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 366.7% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 173.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 46.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 87.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 148.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 2,407, a 52.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,450 vs 11,408 (129.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.6 GHz+64%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	3,668	25,029+582%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	2,407+72%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	11,408+366%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($42 vs $196), Celeron G6900T was $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 37.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$42-79%	$196
Performance per Dollar	87.3	127.7+46%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search Celeron G6900T on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.