
Celeron G6900T

Core i5-7300U
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-7300U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-7300U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-7300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G6900T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1356 and DDR4.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i5-7300U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i5-7300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Core i5-7300U
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G6900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,631 vs 3,668).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1356 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G6900T better than Core i5-7300U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900T vs Core i5-7300U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T
The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-7300U
The Core i5-7300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,631 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-7300U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7300U — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-7300U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-7300U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i5-7300U's 3,631 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G6900T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 3 MB on the Core i5-7300U.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-7300U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+8% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,668+1% | 3,631 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-7300U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7300U — the Celeron G6900T supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 12 (Core i5-7300U) — the Celeron G6900T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-7300U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+125% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+67% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7300U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900T) and HD Graphics 620 (Core i5-7300U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i5-7300U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i5-7300U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | HD Graphics 620 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













