
Celeron G6900T
Popular choices:

Core i7-10510Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Celeron G6900T
2022Why buy it
- ✅+10.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of UTFCBGA1377 and older memory support.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i7-10510Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,450 vs 2,960).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i7-10510Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-10510Y
2019Why buy it
- ✅+20.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,270 vs 1,400).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on UTFCBGA1377, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.
Celeron G6900T
2022Core i7-10510Y
2019Why buy it
- ✅+10.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of UTFCBGA1377 and older memory support.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i7-10510Y.
Why buy it
- ✅+20.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,450 vs 2,960).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i7-10510Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,270 vs 1,400).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on UTFCBGA1377, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G6900T better than Core i7-10510Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900T and Core i7-10510Y

Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T
The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-10510Y
Core i7-10510Y
The Core i7-10510Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,631 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-10510Y offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-10510Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10510Y — a 46.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510Y (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-10510Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i7-10510Y's 3,631 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G6900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,270, a 9.7% lead for the Celeron G6900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,450 vs 2,960 (18.9% advantage for the Core i7-10510Y). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10510Y.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+61% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+133% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Comet Lake-Y (2019) |
| PassMark | 3,668+1% | 3,631 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400+10% | 1,270 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,450 | 2,960+21% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-10510Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i7-10510Y — the Celeron G6900T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 10 (Core i7-10510Y) — the Celeron G6900T offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and Comet Lake-Y (Core i7-10510Y).
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | UTFCBGA1377 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+67% | LPDDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+100% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900T) and Intel UHD Graphics 617 (Core i7-10510Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i7-10510Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | Celeron G6900T | Core i7-10510Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | Ultrabook/Tablet |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












