Celeron G6900T vs Core i7-10510Y

CPU

GPU

Celeron G6900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2022

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-10510Y

4 Cores8 Thrd512 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G6900T vs Core i7-10510Y Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900T

2 / 2

3,668

+1.0%

3,631

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i7-10510Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i7-10510Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of UTFCBGA1377 and older memory support.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i7-10510Y.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10510Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,450 vs 2,960).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i7-10510Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-10510Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on UTFCBGA1377, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10510Y better than Celeron G6900T?

Yes. Core i7-10510Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 20.8% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10510Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10510Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 20.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10510Y is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10510Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900T is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (87.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of UTFCBGA1377. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs Core i7-10510Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-10510Y

The Core i7-10510Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,631 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-10510Y offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-10510Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10510Y — a 46.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510Y (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-10510Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Core i7-10510Y's 3,631 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G6900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,270, a 9.7% lead for the Celeron G6900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,450 vs 2,960 (18.9% advantage for the Core i7-10510Y). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10510Y.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i7-10510Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.5 GHz+61%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+133%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark	3,668+1%	3,631
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400+10%	1,270
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	2,960+21%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-10510Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i7-10510Y — the Celeron G6900T supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 10 (Core i7-10510Y) — the Celeron G6900T offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and Comet Lake-Y (Core i7-10510Y).

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i7-10510Y
Socket	LGA1700	UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+125%	LPDDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+700%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+100%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900T) and Intel UHD Graphics 617 (Core i7-10510Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i7-10510Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Core i7-10510Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	Intel UHD Graphics 617
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	Ultrabook/Tablet