Celeron G6900T
VS
Xeon W3580

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon W3580

Intel

Celeron G6900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Xeon W3580

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900T

#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
107%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
106%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
53%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
105%
#257
Core i9-14900
MSRP: $524|Avg: $589
105%
#258
Core i5-8600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $130
105%
#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
104%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
104%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
103%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
103%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
52%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
102%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
101%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
101%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
101%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
101%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
100%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
100%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
100%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
100%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
98%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
98%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
97%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
97%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
97%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
96%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
42%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
39%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3580

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
16801%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3172%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2818%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2177%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
99%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
98%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
98%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
98%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
97%
#797
Xeon W3580
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
100%
#798
Xeon W3690
MSRP: $583|Avg: $140
100%
#800
Xeon E5-2428L
MSRP: $692|Avg: $42
99%
#803
Opteron 6380
MSRP: $551|Avg: $111
98%
#812
Xeon E3-1220L
MSRP: $189|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G6900T (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G6900TXeon W3580
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W3580 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G6900TXeon W3580
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+65%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900T and Xeon W3580

Intel

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon W3580

The Xeon W3580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,638 points. Launch price was $215.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon W3580 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3580 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3580 — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon W3580 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W3580 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Xeon W3580's 3,638 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G6900T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3580.

FeatureCeleron G6900TXeon W3580
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.33 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-84%
45 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,668
3,638
Geekbench 6 Single
1,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W3580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G6900TXeon W3580
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) / not specified (Xeon W3580). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Xeon W3580 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

FeatureCeleron G6900TXeon W3580
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G6900T launched at $42 MSRP, while the Xeon W3580 debuted at $294. At current prices ($50 vs $30), the Xeon W3580 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 73.4 pts/$ vs 121.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W3580 — making the Xeon W3580 the 49.2% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G6900TXeon W3580
MSRP
$42-86%
$294
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$30-40%
Performance per Dollar
73.4
121.3+65%
Release Date
2022
2009