Celeron G6900T vs Xeon W3580

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon W3580 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon W3580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $252 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 605.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3580 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon W3580

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,638 vs 3,668).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 87.3 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1366, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900T better than Xeon W3580?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3580 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G6900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900T comes in $252 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3580 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 605.8% better value on MSRP (87.3 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2009), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1366, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs Xeon W3580 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon W3580

The Xeon W3580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,638 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon W3580 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3580 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3580 — a 25% clock advantage for the Xeon W3580 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W3580 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Xeon W3580's 3,638 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G6900T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3580.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Xeon W3580
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.33 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-84%	45 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,668	3,638
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W3580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Xeon W3580
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) / not specified (Xeon W3580). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Xeon W3580 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Xeon W3580
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the Xeon W3580 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($42 vs $294), Celeron G6900T was $252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 12.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W3580 — making the Celeron G6900T the 150.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Xeon W3580
MSRP	$42-86%	$294
Performance per Dollar	87.3+604%	12.4
Release Date	2022	2009

Search Celeron G6900T on Amazon

Search Xeon W3580 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.