Celeron J1900 vs Pentium N3520

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium N3520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium N3520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1900

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium N3520 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium N3520

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,144 vs 1,152).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron J1900 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1900 better than Pentium N3520?

Yes. Celeron J1900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.7% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1900 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron J1900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% higher PassMark. Pentium N3520 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium N3520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1900

The Celeron J1900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,152 points. Launch price was $82.

Pentium N3520

The Pentium N3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.17 GHz, with boost up to 2.42 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,144 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J1900 and Pentium N3520 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.42 GHz on the Celeron J1900 versus 2.42 GHz on the Pentium N3520 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.17 GHz). The Celeron J1900 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium N3520 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1900 scores 1,152 against the Pentium N3520's 1,144 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron J1900. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1900 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3520.

Feature	Celeron J1900	Pentium N3520
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.42 GHz	2.42 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.17 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,152	1,144

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Celeron J1900	Pentium N3520
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—