Celeron J3160
VS
A4-5300B

Celeron J3160 vs A4-5300B

Intel

Celeron J3160

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016
VS
AMD

A4-5300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J3160 is positioned at rank 485 and the A4-5300B is on rank 781, so the Celeron J3160 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7481%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7068%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5132%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1546%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1225%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1071%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
614%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
606%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
545%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
531%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
523%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
521%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
516%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
99%
#485
Celeron J3160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#491
Pentium G4600T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $35
98%
#493
Core i5-6500T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $35
98%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
98%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15008%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14181%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10297%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3102%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2457%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2149%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1231%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1215%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1106%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1106%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1094%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1049%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1045%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1036%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#781
A4-5300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#782
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
100%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
99%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
99%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
99%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-5300B leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron J3160 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron J3160A4-5300B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J3160A4-5300B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3160 and A4-5300B

Intel

Celeron J3160

The Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

A4-5300B

The A4-5300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,246 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Celeron J3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the A4-5300B offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3160 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron J3160 versus 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300B — a 46.6% clock advantage for the A4-5300B (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron J3160 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the A4-5300B uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3160 scores 1,250 against the A4-5300B's 1,246 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J3160. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 428, a 20.1% lead for the A4-5300B that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron J3160A4-5300B
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.24 GHz
3.6 GHz+61%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+112%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,250
1,246
Geekbench 6 Single
350
428+22%
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-5300B uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The A4-5300B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J3160) vs 16 (A4-5300B) — the A4-5300B offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3160) and A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300B).

FeatureCeleron J3160A4-5300B
Socket
FCBGA1170
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3160) vs AMD-V (A4-5300B). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 400 (Celeron J3160) and Radeon HD 7480D (A4-5300B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3160 targets Low Power, A4-5300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J3160 rivals Pentium J3710; A4-5300B rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureCeleron J3160A4-5300B
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 400
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Low Power
Business Desktop