Celeron J3160
VS
Core i3-330E

Celeron J3160 vs Core i3-330E

Intel

Celeron J3160

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i3-330E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J3160 is positioned at rank 485 and the Core i3-330E is on rank 1157, so the Celeron J3160 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7481%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7068%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5132%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1546%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1225%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1071%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
614%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
606%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
545%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
531%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
523%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
521%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
516%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
99%
#485
Celeron J3160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#491
Pentium G4600T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $35
98%
#493
Core i5-6500T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $35
98%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
98%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-330E

#1145
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4121%
#1146
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4060%
#1147
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3728%
#1148
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3711%
#1149
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3677%
#1151
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3551%
#1152
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3404%
#1153
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3399%
#1154
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3308%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
100%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1160
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
95%
#1168
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J3160 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron J3160Core i3-330E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($89)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-330E (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron J3160Core i3-330E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($89)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3160 and Core i3-330E

Intel

Celeron J3160

The Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i3-330E

The Core i3-330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,260 points. Launch price was $177.

Processing Power

The Celeron J3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-330E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3160 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron J3160 versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-330E — a 194.7% clock advantage for the Celeron J3160 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron J3160 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-330E uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3160 scores 1,250 against the Core i3-330E's 1,260 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-330E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3160 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-330E.

FeatureCeleron J3160Core i3-330E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.24 GHz+7367%
0.03 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.13 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,250
1,260
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-330E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron J3160Core i3-330E
Socket
FCBGA1170
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3160) / not specified (Core i3-330E). The Celeron J3160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 400), while the Core i3-330E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3160 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3160 rivals Pentium J3710.

FeatureCeleron J3160Core i3-330E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power