Celeron J3160 vs Pentium N3700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3160 vs Pentium N3700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3160 vs Pentium N3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3160

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 400, while Pentium N3700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium N3700

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,248 vs 1,250).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3160 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3160 better than Pentium N3700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium N3700 is ahead with 7.1% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3160 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3160 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J3160 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3160 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J3160 vs Pentium N3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3160

The Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium N3700

The Pentium N3700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J3160 and Pentium N3700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron J3160 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium N3700 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Pentium N3700 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron J3160 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium N3700 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3160 scores 1,250 against the Pentium N3700's 1,248 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron J3160. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron J3160	Pentium N3700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.24 GHz	2.4 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,250	1,248
Geekbench 6 Single	350	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Celeron J3160	Pentium N3700
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3160) / not specified (Pentium N3700). The Celeron J3160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium N3700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3160 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3160 rivals Pentium J3710.