Celeron J3160
VS
Pentium N3700

Celeron J3160 vs Pentium N3700

Intel

Celeron J3160

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Pentium N3700

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J3160 is positioned at rank 485 and the Pentium N3700 is on rank 789, so the Celeron J3160 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7481%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7068%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5132%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1546%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1225%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1071%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
614%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
606%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
545%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
531%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
523%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
521%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
516%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
99%
#485
Celeron J3160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#491
Pentium G4600T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $35
98%
#493
Core i5-6500T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $35
98%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
98%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium N3700

#777
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1175%
#778
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1158%
#779
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1063%
#780
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1058%
#781
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1049%
#783
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1013%
#784
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
971%
#785
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
970%
#786
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
944%
#789
Pentium N3700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
98%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium N3700 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron J3160 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron J3160Pentium N3700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Braswell (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J3160Pentium N3700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3160 and Pentium N3700

Intel

Celeron J3160

The Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium N3700

The Pentium N3700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J3160 and Pentium N3700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron J3160 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium N3700 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Pentium N3700 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron J3160 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium N3700 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3160 scores 1,250 against the Pentium N3700's 1,248 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron J3160. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron J3160Pentium N3700
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.24 GHz
2.4 GHz+7%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,250
1,248
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCeleron J3160Pentium N3700
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3160) / not specified (Pentium N3700). The Celeron J3160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium N3700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3160 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3160 rivals Pentium J3710.

FeatureCeleron J3160Pentium N3700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power