A4-1250 vs Celeron J3160
A4-1250
Celeron J3160
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-1250 is positioned at rank 1023 and the Celeron J3160 is on rank 485, so the Celeron J3160 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-1250
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3160
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-1250 | Celeron J3160 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-1250 | Celeron J3160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-1250 and Celeron J3160
A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron J3160
The Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J3160 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3160 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron J3160 — a 76.5% clock advantage for the Celeron J3160. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J3160 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Celeron J3160's 1,250 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-1250. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 111 vs 350, a 103.7% lead for the Celeron J3160 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 188 vs 650 (110.3% advantage for the Celeron J3160). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron J3160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 2.24 GHz+124% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Airmont (2016) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | 350+215% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | 650+246% |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J3160 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron J3160 — the A4-1250 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Celeron J3160). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 4 (Celeron J3160) — the A4-1250 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3160).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron J3160 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8+100% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A4-1250) vs VT-x (Celeron J3160). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8210 (A4-1250) and HD Graphics 400 (Celeron J3160) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet, Celeron J3160 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740; Celeron J3160 rivals Pentium J3710.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Celeron J3160 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | HD Graphics 400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | Tablet | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-1250 and Celeron J3160
