Celeron J3160
VS
Core i5-12400F

Celeron J3160 vs Core i5-12400F

Intel

Celeron J3160

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron J3160 is positioned at rank #485 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3160

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7481%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7068%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5132%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1546%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1225%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1071%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
614%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
606%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
545%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
531%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
523%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
521%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
516%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
99%
#485
Celeron J3160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
100%
#491
Pentium G4600T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $35
98%
#493
Core i5-6500T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $35
98%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
98%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-12400F (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron J3160Core i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron J3160 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron J3160Core i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3160 and Core i5-12400F

Intel

Celeron J3160

The Celeron J3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Celeron J3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron J3160 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 65.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron J3160 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3160 scores 1,250 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 175.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 1,700, a 131.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 650 vs 657 (1.1% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3160 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureCeleron J3160Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
2.24 GHz
4.4 GHz+96%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
0 kB
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
1,250
19,532+1463%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
350
1,700+386%
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
657+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron J3160 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J3160) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3160) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureCeleron J3160Core i5-12400F
Socket
FCBGA1170
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
20+400%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3160) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Celeron J3160 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 400), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3160 targets Low Power, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron J3160 rivals Pentium J3710; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCeleron J3160Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power
Gaming Performance/Value