Celeron M 540
VS
A6-9500E

Celeron M 540 vs A6-9500E

Intel

Celeron M 540

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2007
VS
AMD

A6-9500E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 540 is positioned at rank 873 and the A6-9500E is on rank 609, so the A6-9500E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 540

#861
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1447%
#862
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1426%
#863
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1309%
#864
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1303%
#865
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1291%
#867
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1247%
#868
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1195%
#869
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1193%
#870
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1161%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#883
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10150%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7369%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2220%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1538%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
881%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
870%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
792%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
792%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
762%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
751%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
748%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
741%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
100%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#609
A6-9500E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
98%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron M 540A6-9500E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron M 540 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron M 540A6-9500E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 540 and A6-9500E

Intel

Celeron M 540

The Celeron M 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,744 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A6-9500E

The A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,741 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 540 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the A6-9500E offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-9500E has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M 540 versus 3.4 GHz on the A6-9500E — a 58.6% clock advantage for the A6-9500E. The Celeron M 540 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 540 scores 1,744 against the A6-9500E's 1,741 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron M 540.

FeatureCeleron M 540A6-9500E
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
3.4 GHz+83%
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1024 kB
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,744
1,741
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches 667 on the Celeron M 540 versus DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500E — the Celeron M 540 supports 197.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500E supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 540) vs 8 (A6-9500E) — the A6-9500E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 540) and AMD AM4 (A6-9500E).

FeatureCeleron M 540A6-9500E
Socket
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
667+16575%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
4
32 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron M 540) / not specified (A6-9500E). The A6-9500E includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Celeron M 540 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron M 540 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.

FeatureCeleron M 540A6-9500E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
AMD Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false