Celeron M 575 vs Atom C3538
Celeron M 575
Atom C3538
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 575 is positioned at rank 827 and the Atom C3538 is on rank 389, so the Atom C3538 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3538
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron M 575 | Atom C3538 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($12) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron M 575 | Atom C3538 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($12) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 575 and Atom C3538
Celeron M 575
The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.
Atom C3538
The Atom C3538 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Celeron M 575 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom C3538 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3538 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 versus 2.1 GHz on the Atom C3538 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Atom C3538. The Celeron M 575 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom C3538 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 575 scores 1,917 against the Atom C3538's 1,910 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 575.
| Feature | Celeron M 575 | Atom C3538 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 4 / 4+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 1,917 | 1,910 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron M 575 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom C3538 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron M 575 versus DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3538 — the Celeron M 575 supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3538 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 575) vs 12 (Atom C3538) — the Atom C3538 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 575) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3538).
| Feature | Celeron M 575 | Atom C3538 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | 800+19900% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 256 GB+6710886300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Celeron M 575) / not specified (Atom C3538). Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.
| Feature | Celeron M 575 | Atom C3538 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron M 575 and Atom C3538
