Celeron M 575
VS
Pentium G3240

Celeron M 575 vs Pentium G3240

Intel

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Pentium G3240

2 Cores2 Thrd53 WW2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 575 is positioned at rank 827 and the Pentium G3240 is on rank 757, so the Pentium G3240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1316%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1297%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1191%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1185%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1174%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1134%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1087%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1086%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1057%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#828
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14371%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13580%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9860%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2970%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2353%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2058%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1179%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1163%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1059%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1059%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1047%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1019%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1005%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1001%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
992%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
100%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G3240 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron M 575Pentium G3240
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($12)
⚠️ Higher cost ($126)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron M 575 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron M 575Pentium G3240
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+943%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($12)
⚠️ Higher cost ($126)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 575 and Pentium G3240

Intel

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium G3240

The Pentium G3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,930 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 575 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G3240 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G3240 has 1 more core. The Celeron M 575 is built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron M 575 scores 1,917 against the Pentium G3240's 1,930 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G3240.

FeatureCeleron M 575Pentium G3240
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,917
1,930
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 575 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3240 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M 575Pentium G3240
Socket
PGA478
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron M 575) / not specified (Pentium G3240). Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeatureCeleron M 575Pentium G3240
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron M 575 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium G3240 debuted at $89. At current prices ($12 vs $126), the Celeron M 575 is $114 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 575 delivers 159.8 pts/$ vs 15.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240 — making the Celeron M 575 the 165% better value option.

FeatureCeleron M 575Pentium G3240
MSRP
$86-3%
$89
Avg Price (30d)
$12-90%
$126
Performance per Dollar
159.8+944%
15.3
Release Date
2008
2014