Celeron M 575 vs Core i5-2415M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 575 vs Core i5-2415M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 575 vs Core i5-2415M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 575

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,917 vs 1,933).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core i5-2415M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2415M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-2415M

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Celeron M 575 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2415M better than Celeron M 575?

Yes. Core i5-2415M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-2415M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2415M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2415M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-2415M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 575 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2415M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 575 vs Core i5-2415M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

Core i5-2415M

The Core i5-2415M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,933 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 575 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-2415M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2415M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2415M — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-2415M. The Celeron M 575 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2415M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 575 scores 1,917 against the Core i5-2415M's 1,933 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-2415M.

Feature	Celeron M 575	Core i5-2415M
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
Base Clock	—	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,917	1,933

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 575 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2415M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron M 575 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2415M — the Core i5-2415M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2415M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 575) vs 16 (Core i5-2415M) — the Core i5-2415M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron M 575	Core i5-2415M
Socket	PGA478	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	DDR3-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 575) vs VT-x (Core i5-2415M). The Core i5-2415M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Celeron M 575 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2415M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.