Celeron M 575 vs V-Series V140

Celeron M 575 vs V-Series V140 Performance Spectrum

Celeron M 575

1 / 1

1,917

+0.2%

Pentium 3556U

Pentium Dual Core T4400

1,913

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 575 vs V-Series V140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 575 vs V-Series V140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 575

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while V-Series V140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V140

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,913 vs 1,917).
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 575 better than V-Series V140?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, V-Series V140 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 575 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 575 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 575 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 575 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that V-Series V140 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

V-Series V140 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 575 vs V-Series V140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

V-Series V140

The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 14% clock advantage for the V-Series V140. The Celeron M 575 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 575 scores 1,917 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron M 575.

Feature	Celeron M 575	V-Series V140
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.3 GHz+15%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,917	1,913

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 575 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.