Celeron M 575
VS
V-Series V140

Celeron M 575 vs V-Series V140

Intel

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
AMD

V-Series V140

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 575 is positioned at rank 827 and the V-Series V140 is on rank 579, so the V-Series V140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1316%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1297%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1191%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1185%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1174%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1134%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1087%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1086%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1057%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#828
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar V-Series V140

#567
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
767%
#568
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
756%
#569
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
694%
#570
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
691%
#571
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
684%
#573
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
661%
#574
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
634%
#575
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
633%
#576
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
616%
#579
V-Series V140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The V-Series V140 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron M 575 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron M 575V-Series V140
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($12)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron M 575V-Series V140
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($12)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140

Intel

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

V-Series V140

The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 14% clock advantage for the V-Series V140. The Celeron M 575 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 575 scores 1,917 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron M 575.

FeatureCeleron M 575V-Series V140
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,917
1,913
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 575 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M 575V-Series V140
Socket
PGA478
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron M 575) / not specified (V-Series V140). Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeatureCeleron M 575V-Series V140
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false