Celeron M 575
VS
Celeron G1850

Celeron M 575 vs Celeron G1850

Intel

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron G1850

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 575 is positioned at rank 827 and the Celeron G1850 is on rank 450, so the Celeron G1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1316%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1297%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1191%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1185%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1174%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1134%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1087%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1086%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1057%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#828
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1850

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6866%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6488%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4711%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1419%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1124%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
983%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
563%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
556%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
506%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
506%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
500%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
487%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
480%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
478%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
474%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
99%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
99%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
99%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
98%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
100%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
100%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
99%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
99%
#463
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1850 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron M 575Celeron G1850
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($12)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron M 575 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron M 575Celeron G1850
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+151%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($12)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 575 and Celeron G1850

Intel

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 575 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron G1850 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron G1850 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850. The Celeron M 575 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G1850 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 575 scores 1,917 against the Celeron G1850's 1,907 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 575.

FeatureCeleron M 575Celeron G1850
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.9 GHz+45%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,917
1,907
Geekbench 6 Single
543
Geekbench 6 Multi
945
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 575 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G1850 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron M 575 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 — the Celeron M 575 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1850 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 575) vs 16 (Celeron G1850) — the Celeron G1850 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 575) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1850).

FeatureCeleron M 575Celeron G1850
Socket
PGA478
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
800+26567%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
4
32 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 575) vs VT-x (Celeron G1850). The Celeron G1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Celeron M 575 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40; Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureCeleron M 575Celeron G1850
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron M 575 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Celeron G1850 debuted at $42. At current prices ($12 vs $30), the Celeron M 575 is $18 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 575 delivers 159.8 pts/$ vs 63.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G1850 — making the Celeron M 575 the 86.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron M 575Celeron G1850
MSRP
$86
$42-51%
Avg Price (30d)
$12-60%
$30
Performance per Dollar
159.8+151%
63.6
Release Date
2008
2014