Celeron N2805 vs A10 Micro-6700T
Celeron N2805
A10 Micro-6700T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2805 is positioned at rank 250 and the A10 Micro-6700T is on rank 724, so the Celeron N2805 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2805
Performance Per Dollar A10 Micro-6700T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron N2805 | A10 Micro-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron N2805 | A10 Micro-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2805 and A10 Micro-6700T
Celeron N2805
The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.
A10 Micro-6700T
The A10 Micro-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,426 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron N2805 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A10 Micro-6700T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10 Micro-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 versus 2.2 GHz on the A10 Micro-6700T — a 40.4% clock advantage for the A10 Micro-6700T (base: 1.46 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron N2805 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the A10 Micro-6700T uses Mullins (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2805 scores 1,430 against the A10 Micro-6700T's 1,426 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N2805.
| Feature | Celeron N2805 | A10 Micro-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.46 GHz | 2.2 GHz+51% |
| Base Clock | 1.46 GHz+22% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2048 kB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Mullins (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,430 | 1,426 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 250 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N2805 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10 Micro-6700T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2805 versus DDR3-1333 on the A10 Micro-6700T — the Celeron N2805 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10 Micro-6700T supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Celeron N2805 | A10 Micro-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+35433% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 | 8 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2805) vs AMD-V (A10 Micro-6700T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2805) and Radeon R6 (A10 Micro-6700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 Micro-6700T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100; A10 Micro-6700T rivals Atom Z3770.
| Feature | Celeron N2805 | A10 Micro-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Radeon R6 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Tablet |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron N2805 and A10 Micro-6700T
