Celeron N2805
VS
A8-3520M

Celeron N2805 vs A8-3520M

Intel

Celeron N2805

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.46 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A8-3520M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2805 is positioned at rank 250 and the A8-3520M is on rank 806, so the Celeron N2805 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2805

#237
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
410%
#238
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
404%
#239
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
371%
#240
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
370%
#241
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
366%
#243
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
354%
#244
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
339%
#245
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
338%
#246
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
329%
#250
Celeron N2805
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3520M

#794
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1221%
#795
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1204%
#796
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1105%
#797
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1100%
#798
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1090%
#800
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1052%
#801
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1009%
#802
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1007%
#803
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
980%
#806
A8-3520M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
99%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-3520M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N2805 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron N2805A8-3520M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2805A8-3520M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2805 and A8-3520M

Intel

Celeron N2805

The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

A8-3520M

The A8-3520M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,441 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Celeron N2805 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-3520M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3520M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 versus 2.5 GHz on the A8-3520M — a 52.5% clock advantage for the A8-3520M (base: 1.46 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron N2805 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the A8-3520M uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2805 scores 1,430 against the A8-3520M's 1,441 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-3520M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N2805A8-3520M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.46 GHz
2.5 GHz+71%
Base Clock
1.46 GHz
1.6 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,430
1,441
Geekbench 6 Single
255
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2805 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-3520M uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2805 versus DDR3-1333 on the A8-3520M — the Celeron N2805 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-3520M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2805) vs 2 (A8-3520M). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2805) vs 20 (A8-3520M) — the A8-3520M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron N2805A8-3520M
Socket
FCBGA1170
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
4
16 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
20+400%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2805) vs AMD-V (A8-3520M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2805) and Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3520M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3520M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100; A8-3520M rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureCeleron N2805A8-3520M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Radeon HD 6620G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop