Celeron N2805 vs Pentium M 740

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2805 vs Pentium M 740 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2805 vs Pentium M 740: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2805

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 27W, a 23W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium M 740 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,430 vs 1,435).

Pentium M 740

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌575% higher power demand at 27W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2805 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 740 better than Celeron N2805?

Yes. Pentium M 740 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 740 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 740 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 740 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 740 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2805 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2805 vs Pentium M 740 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2805

The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium M 740

The Pentium M 740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2805 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 740 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N2805 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 versus 1.73 GHz on the Pentium M 740 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Pentium M 740 (base: 1.46 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Celeron N2805 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium M 740 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2805 scores 1,430 against the Pentium M 740's 1,435 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium M 740. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2805	Pentium M 740
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.46 GHz	1.73 GHz+18%
Base Clock	1.46 GHz	1.73 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,430	1,435

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2805 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 740 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2805	Pentium M 740
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	4	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2805) / not specified (Pentium M 740). The Celeron N2805 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium M 740 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100.