Celeron N2806
VS
A4-3310MX

Celeron N2806 vs A4-3310MX

Intel

Celeron N2806

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A4-3310MX

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2806 is positioned at rank 199 and the A4-3310MX is on rank 887, so the Celeron N2806 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2806

#187
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
368%
#188
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
363%
#189
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
333%
#190
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
332%
#191
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
329%
#193
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
317%
#194
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
304%
#195
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
304%
#196
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
296%
#199
Celeron N2806
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-3310MX

#875
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1480%
#876
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1458%
#877
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1338%
#878
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1332%
#879
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1320%
#881
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1275%
#882
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1222%
#883
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1220%
#884
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1188%
#887
A4-3310MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
100%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
99%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
98%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
98%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-3310MX leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron N2806 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N2806A4-3310MX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2806A4-3310MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2806 and A4-3310MX

Intel

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2806 and A4-3310MX share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 versus 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A4-3310MX (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron N2806 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the A4-3310MX uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2806 scores 1,195 against the A4-3310MX's 1,190 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N2806. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N2806A4-3310MX
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,195
1,190
Geekbench 6 Single
273
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2806 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-3310MX uses FS1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N2806A4-3310MX
Socket
FCBGA1170
FS1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N2806) / AMD-V (A4-3310MX). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Celeron N2806 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.

FeatureCeleron N2806A4-3310MX
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6480G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop