Celeron N2810 vs Pentium M 735

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2810 vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2810 vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2810

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 21W, a 14W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium M 735 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2810 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,459 vs 1,474).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Celeron N2810 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 21W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2810 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2810 better than Pentium M 735?

Yes. Celeron N2810 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2810 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2810 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2810 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2810 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium M 735 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2004 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2810 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2810 vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2810 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N2810 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Celeron N2810 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron N2810 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2810 scores 1,474 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N2810. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2810	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,474+1%	1,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2810 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2810 versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the Celeron N2810 supports -420.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N2810 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron N2810) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2810) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the Celeron N2810 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron N2810	Pentium M 735
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2810) vs None (Pentium M 735). The Celeron N2810 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.