
Celeron N2810

Phenom X4 9450e
Celeron N2810 vs Phenom X4 9450e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N2810 vs Phenom X4 9450e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N2810 vs Phenom X4 9450e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N2810
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Phenom X4 9450e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Phenom X4 9450e
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2810 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,474).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Celeron N2810 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2810 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron N2810 better than Phenom X4 9450e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N2810 vs Phenom X4 9450e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2810
The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Phenom X4 9450e
The Phenom X4 9450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron N2810 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9450e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9450e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X4 9450e — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9450e. The Celeron N2810 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2810 scores 1,474 against the Phenom X4 9450e's 1,455 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron N2810. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2810 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9450e.
| Feature | Celeron N2810 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,474+1% | 1,455 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N2810 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N2810 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron N2810) / not specified (Phenom X4 9450e). The Celeron N2810 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Phenom X4 9450e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.
| Feature | Celeron N2810 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















