Celeron N3000 vs Celeron T1600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3000 vs Celeron T1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3000 vs Celeron T1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3000

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Celeron T1600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (705 vs 715).

Celeron T1600

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Celeron N3000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T1600 better than Celeron N3000?

Yes. Celeron T1600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T1600 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 1.4% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T1600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T1600 is the better buy right now. Celeron T1600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N3000 vs Celeron T1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3000

The Celeron N3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron T1600

The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3000 is built on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N3000 scores 705 against the Celeron T1600's 715 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron T1600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3000 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600.

Feature	Celeron N3000	Celeron T1600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.08 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.04 GHz	1.66 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	705	715+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	160	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	290	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3000 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3000	Celeron T1600
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron N3000) / not specified (Celeron T1600). The Celeron N3000 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Celeron T1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3000 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N3000 rivals AMD E2-7110.