Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron N3000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron N3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron N3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N3000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron N3000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Celeron N3000

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (290 vs 293).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3000 better than Celeron 1047UE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N3000 is ahead with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1047UE pulls ahead with 1% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1047UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3000 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron N3000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 1047UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron N3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Celeron N3000

The Celeron N3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and Celeron N3000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 2.08 GHz on the Celeron N3000 — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3000. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N3000 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Celeron N3000's 705 — a 4.3% lead for the Celeron N3000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 160, a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N3000 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 290 (1% advantage for the Celeron 1047UE). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3000.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron N3000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	2.08 GHz+49%
Base Clock	—	1.04 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	675	705+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	159	160
Geekbench 6 Multi	293+1%	290

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3000 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 4 (Celeron N3000) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and SoC (Celeron N3000).

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron N3000
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron N3000). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1047UE) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3000) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3000 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N3000 rivals AMD E2-7110.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron N3000
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Budget Laptop