Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium SU4100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 184.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium SU4100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (675 vs 685).
❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

Pentium SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1047UE better than Pentium SU4100?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 1047UE is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1047UE is the better buy right now. Celeron 1047UE comes in $189 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium SU4100 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 184.8% better value on MSRP (6.8 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and Pentium SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 1047UE. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 1.5% lead for the Pentium SU4100. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU4100.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz+8%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	675	685+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	159	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Pentium SU4100
Socket	BGA1023	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (Pentium SU4100). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Pentium SU4100
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Pentium SU4100 came in at $289. On launch pricing ($100 vs $289), Celeron 1047UE was $189 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the Celeron 1047UE the 96% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Pentium SU4100
MSRP	$100-65%	$289
Performance per Dollar	6.8+183%	2.4
Release Date	2013	2009

Search Celeron 1047UE on Amazon

Search Pentium SU4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.