Celeron 1047UE
VS
Pentium SU4100

Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium SU4100

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1047UE is positioned at rank 1170 and the Pentium SU4100 is on rank 1235, so the Celeron 1047UE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4347%
#1159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4283%
#1160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3932%
#1161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3914%
#1162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3878%
#1164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3745%
#1165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3591%
#1166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3585%
#1167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3489%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium SU4100

#1223
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
12380%
#1224
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
12198%
#1225
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
11198%
#1226
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
11148%
#1227
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
11046%
#1229
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
10667%
#1230
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
10228%
#1231
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
10211%
#1232
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
9937%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
100%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
90%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
87%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
86%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
78%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 1047UE leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium SU4100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1047UEPentium SU4100
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium SU4100 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 85% cheaper ($15 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 1047UEPentium SU4100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+577%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1047UE and Pentium SU4100

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and Pentium SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 1047UE. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 1.5% lead for the Pentium SU4100. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU4100.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium SU4100
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz+8%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
675
685+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
159
Geekbench 6 Multi
293
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium SU4100
Socket
BGA1023
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (Pentium SU4100). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium SU4100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1047UE launched at $100 MSRP, while the Pentium SU4100 debuted at $289. At current prices ($100 vs $15), the Pentium SU4100 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 45.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the Pentium SU4100 the 148.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium SU4100
MSRP
$100-65%
$289
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$15-85%
Performance per Dollar
6.8
45.7+572%
Release Date
2013
2009