Celeron 1047UE
VS
E1-1500

Celeron 1047UE vs E1-1500

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E1-1500

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.48 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1047UE is positioned at rank 1170 and the E1-1500 is on rank 979, so the E1-1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4347%
#1159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4283%
#1160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3932%
#1161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3914%
#1162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3878%
#1164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3745%
#1165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3591%
#1166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3585%
#1167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3489%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-1500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
28338%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
26776%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19442%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5857%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2325%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2294%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2089%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2089%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2065%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2010%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1982%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1974%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1956%
#979
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#980
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
100%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
100%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
99%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
99%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
98%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
97%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
96%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
96%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
95%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
95%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
93%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
93%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The E1-1500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1047UE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1047UEE1-1500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the E1-1500 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 90% cheaper ($10 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 1047UEE1-1500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+878%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1047UE and E1-1500

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and E1-1500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the E1-1500. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-1500 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the E1-1500's 660 — a 2.2% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the E1-1500.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEE1-1500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.48 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-45%
40 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
675+2%
660
Geekbench 6 Single
159
Geekbench 6 Multi
293
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-1500 uses FT1 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEE1-1500
Socket
BGA1023
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (E1-1500). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E1-1500 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEE1-1500
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1047UE launched at $100 MSRP, while the E1-1500 debuted at $60. At current prices ($100 vs $10), the E1-1500 is $90 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 66.0 pts/$ for the E1-1500 — making the E1-1500 the 162.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEE1-1500
MSRP
$100
$60-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$10-90%
Performance per Dollar
6.8
66.0+871%
Release Date
2013
2013