Celeron 1047UE vs E1-1500

Celeron 1047UE vs E1-1500 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1047UE

2 / 2

675

+2.3%

660

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs E1-1500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs E1-1500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while E1-1500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌2744.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 18W.

E1-1500

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 18W instead of 512W, a 494W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 1047UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (660 vs 675).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1047UE better than E1-1500?

Yes. Celeron 1047UE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1047UE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1047UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1047UE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron 1047UE comes in 66.7% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. E1-1500 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1047UE vs E1-1500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

E1-1500

The E1-1500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 660 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and E1-1500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.48 GHz on the E1-1500 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the E1-1500. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-1500 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the E1-1500's 660 — a 2.2% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the E1-1500.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	E1-1500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.48 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-45%	40 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	675+2%	660
Geekbench 6 Single	159	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-1500 uses FT1 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	E1-1500
Socket	BGA1023	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (E1-1500). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E1-1500 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	E1-1500
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the E1-1500 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($100 vs $60), E1-1500 was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the E1-1500 — making the E1-1500 the 47.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	E1-1500
MSRP	$100	$60-40%
Performance per Dollar	6.8	11.0+62%
Release Date	2013	2013

Search Celeron 1047UE on Amazon

Search E1-1500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.