CPU
GPU
Celeron 1047UE
Celeron E1400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1047UE is positioned at rank 1170 and the Celeron E1400 is on rank 930, so the Celeron E1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 1047UE | Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($63) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 1047UE | Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+68%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($63) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1047UE and Celeron E1400
Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.
Celeron E1400
The Celeron E1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $57.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 1047UE and Celeron E1400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 2 GHz on the Celeron E1400 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Celeron E1400. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron E1400 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Celeron E1400's 715 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron E1400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 260, a 48.2% lead for the Celeron E1400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 470 (46.4% advantage for the Celeron E1400). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1400.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (total)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Allendale (2006−2009) |
| PassMark | 675 | 715+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 159 | 260+64% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 293 | 470+60% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E1400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1400 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 0 (Celeron E1400) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1400).
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs No (Celeron E1400). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Celeron E1400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1400 rivals Pentium E2180.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 1047UE launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron E1400 debuted at $53. At current prices ($100 vs $63), the Celeron E1400 is $37 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 11.3 pts/$ for the Celeron E1400 — making the Celeron E1400 the 50.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Celeron E1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $53-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $63-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 11.3+66% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 1047UE and Celeron E1400
