Celeron 1047UE vs Core 2 Duo T5200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Core 2 Duo T5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Core 2 Duo T5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo T5200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T5200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (675 vs 705).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5200

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T5200 better than Celeron 1047UE?

Yes. Core 2 Duo T5200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T5200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T5200 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core 2 Duo T5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 1047UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1047UE vs Core 2 Duo T5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Core 2 Duo T5200

The Core 2 Duo T5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and Core 2 Duo T5200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5200 — a 17% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T5200. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Core 2 Duo T5200's 705 — a 4.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5200. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T5200.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Core 2 Duo T5200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.66 GHz+19%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	675	705+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	159	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Core 2 Duo T5200
Socket	BGA1023	BGA479
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5200). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 requires a dedicated GPU.