PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B730 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B730: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B730 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (675 vs 715).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Celeron B730

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.2 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B730 better than Celeron 1047UE?

Yes. Celeron B730 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B730 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B730 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B730 is the better buy right now. Celeron B730 comes in $30 cheaper on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.3% better value on MSRP (10.2 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B730 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Celeron B730

The Celeron B730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 256 kB + 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1047UE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron B730 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B730 — a 25% clock advantage for the Celeron B730. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron B730 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Celeron B730's 715 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron B730. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B730.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B730
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.8 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+33%	1.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	675	715+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	159	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B730 uses G2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B730 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B730).

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B730
Socket	BGA1023	G2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1047UE) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B730) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B730 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B730 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B730
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Celeron B730 came in at $70. On launch pricing ($100 vs $70), Celeron B730 was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Celeron B730 — making the Celeron B730 the 40.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B730
MSRP	$100	$70-30%
Performance per Dollar	6.8	10.2+50%
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Celeron 1047UE on Amazon

Search Celeron B730 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.