PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron E1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron E1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Celeron E1200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (159 vs 210).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (293 vs 380).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Celeron E1200

2008

Why buy it

✅+32.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E1200 better than Celeron 1047UE?

Yes. Celeron E1200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 29.7% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E1200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E1200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E1200 comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 85.9% better value on MSRP (12.5 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron E1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Celeron E1200

The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and Celeron E1200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron E1200. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron E1200 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Celeron E1200's 665 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 210, a 27.6% lead for the Celeron E1200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 380 (25.9% advantage for the Celeron E1200). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1200.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron E1200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz+14%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (total)+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	675+2%	665
Geekbench 6 Single	159	210+32%
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	380+30%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E1200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1200 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 0 (Celeron E1200) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1200).

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron E1200
Socket	BGA1023	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs No (Celeron E1200). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Celeron E1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron E1200
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	No
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Celeron E1200 came in at $53. On launch pricing ($100 vs $53), Celeron E1200 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 12.5 pts/$ for the Celeron E1200 — making the Celeron E1200 the 60.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron E1200
MSRP	$100	$53-47%
Performance per Dollar	6.8	12.5+84%
Release Date	2013	2008

Search Celeron 1047UE on Amazon

Search Celeron E1200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.