Celeron 1047UE
VS
Celeron E1200

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron E1200

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron E1200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1047UE is positioned at rank 1170 and the Celeron E1200 is on rank 952, so the Celeron E1200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4347%
#1159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4283%
#1160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3932%
#1161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3914%
#1162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3878%
#1164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3745%
#1165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3591%
#1166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3585%
#1167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3489%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
24838%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23469%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17041%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5134%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4066%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3557%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2037%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2011%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1831%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1831%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1810%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1761%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1737%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1730%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1714%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
100%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
99%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
98%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
98%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
98%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
97%
#960
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
97%
#961
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
97%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
96%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
95%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
95%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
94%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
94%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron E1200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1047UE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1047UECeleron E1200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($98)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron E1200 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 2% cheaper ($98 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 1047UECeleron E1200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($98)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1047UE and Celeron E1200

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Celeron E1200

The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1047UE and Celeron E1200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron E1200. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron E1200 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Celeron E1200's 665 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 210, a 27.6% lead for the Celeron E1200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 380 (25.9% advantage for the Celeron E1200). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1200.

FeatureCeleron 1047UECeleron E1200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.6 GHz+14%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (total)+100%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
675+2%
665
Geekbench 6 Single
159
210+32%
Geekbench 6 Multi
293
380+30%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E1200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1200 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 0 (Celeron E1200) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1200).

FeatureCeleron 1047UECeleron E1200
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs No (Celeron E1200). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Celeron E1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140.

FeatureCeleron 1047UECeleron E1200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1047UE launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron E1200 debuted at $53. At current prices ($100 vs $98), the Celeron E1200 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Celeron E1200 — making the Celeron E1200 the 0.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 1047UECeleron E1200
MSRP
$100
$53-47%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$98-2%
Performance per Dollar
6.8
6.8
Release Date
2013
2008